This site is under construction — some pages are still being updated. Check back soon!

Current Research

Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, School of Medicine

Rare Disease Ethics & Policy

What does it take to bring a rare disease therapy from concept to patient—and at what cost to the communities involved? This research examines the ethical, social, and structural dimensions of rare disease drug development and the lived experiences of patients and caregivers navigating the diagnostic odyssey. Across multiple projects, the work engages directly with the stakeholders who shape and are shaped by these processes.

1
Challenges & Tensions in Rare Disease Drug Development
This project investigates the challenges and tensions that emerge throughout the rare disease drug development process. Through qualitative interviews, we engage a broad range of stakeholders to understand the competing priorities, resource constraints, and ethical dilemmas that shape how treatments move from bench to bedside.
Stakeholders
Patient Advocacy Groups
Academic Researchers
Industry Professionals
Federal Regulators
Umbrella Organizations
2
Caregiver Quality of Life & the Value of Genetic Diagnosis
This project involves the development of a caregiver-centered quality of life instrument that captures multiple dimensions of caregiver well-being, alongside a supplemental survey designed to understand and predict the value of genetic sequencing and diagnosis in the rare disease space. Both instruments were informed by a prospective longitudinal study.
Prospective Study Design
Pre-Diagnosis Baseline
Interviews with clinicians, caregivers, and patients prior to receiving a genetic diagnosis
Post-Diagnosis Follow-Up
Follow-up interviews after receiving a genetic diagnosis to capture changes in experience and outlook
Extended Follow-Up
A second follow-up to track longer-term impacts of diagnosis on quality of life and care decisions

Social & Behavioral Genomics

How do diverse stakeholders understand, interpret, and respond to genomic research on social and behavioral traits? This research investigates the ethical, legal, and social implications of behavioral genomics—exploring how genetic findings are communicated, perceived, and acted upon across different professional and community contexts, and how population descriptors in genomic research carry both scientific and social consequences.

Stakeholder Perspectives on Social & Behavioral Genomics

This multi-stakeholder interview study gathers perspectives from social and behavioral research scientists, media journalists, academic journal editors, K-12 educators, parents of children with ADHD and dyslexia, parents who have pursued genetic screening for social and behavioral traits, and employees working in the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic screening space.

Population Descriptors in Genomics Research

This project examines perspectives on the use of ancestry, ethnicity, and race as population descriptors among genome researchers and biobank participants across multiple countries in Africa—exploring how these categories shape research design, interpretation, and equity in global genomics.

Stakeholder Communities Engaged
Social & Behavioral Scientists
Media Journalists
Academic Journal Editors
K-12 Educators
Parents (ADHD/Dyslexia)
Parents (Genetic Screening)
DTC Industry Professionals
Genome Researchers
Biobank Participants

Cross-Cutting Contributions

Across both research areas, I contribute to the full lifecycle of academic research—from study conception through dissemination. My work spans data collection and qualitative analysis, IRB protocol development, grant and proposal writing, and manuscript preparation for peer-reviewed publication. This cross-cutting role allows me to maintain methodological consistency and ensure that the voices of participants are represented with rigor and care across every stage of the research process.

Data Collection
Qualitative Analysis
Protocol Development
Grant Writing
Proposal Development
Manuscript Preparation

Stakeholder Engagement Across Projects

A defining feature of this research is its commitment to engaging a wide range of stakeholders. Across both rare disease and social and behavioral genomics, the work centers the perspectives of people who are directly affected by, or who shape the trajectory of, genomic science and policy.

Stakeholder Engagement
👪
Patients, Caregivers & Families
Rare disease patients, caregivers, parents of children with ADHD/dyslexia, and parents who have pursued genetic screening
🔬
Researchers & Scientists
Academic researchers, social and behavioral scientists, genome researchers, and biobank participants
🏢
Industry & Advocacy
Pharmaceutical and biotech professionals, DTC genetic screening employees, patient advocacy groups, and umbrella organizations
📋
Regulators & Policymakers
Federal regulators and policy leaders involved in drug development and genomic governance
📚
Educators & Media
K-12 educators, academic journal editors, and media journalists covering genomic science